On 11/13/2012 09:27 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > From bbf2566f9f4fc79ff3320e83cafb69533efc9ea0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:21:50 -0800 > > Currently CGRP_CPUSET_CLONE_CHILDREN triggers ->post_clone(). Now > that clone_children is cpuset specific, there's no reason to have this > rather odd option activation mechanism in cgroup core. cpuset can > check the flag from its ->css_allocate() and take the necessary > action. > > Move cpuset_post_clone() logic to the end of cpuset_css_alloc() and > remove cgroup_subsys->post_clone(). > > Loosely based on Glauber's "generalize post_clone into post_create" > patch. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Original-patch-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Original-patch: <1351686554-22592-2-git-send-email-glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I don't have any preference one way or the other. This patch seems to do the job. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
