Hey, Michal. On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not sure I understand. What does deactivate_super has to do with > the above suggestion? cgroup_lock_live_group will take the cgroup_mutex > on the success or frees the previously allocated&unused memory. The > only thing I was suggesting is to do cgroup_lock_live_group first and > allocate the cgroup only if it doesn't fail. It complicates updates to the error exit path. You end up having to update a lot more and it's not like grabbing lock first is substantially better in any way, so why bother? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
