On Wed 31-10-12 13:14:07, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hey, Michal. > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > And sorry for being to annoying about this WARN_ON_ONCE but I really > > don't see any reason for it. pre_destroy can still happen and now it is > > even reduced to a reasonable condition (somebody shown up). So I would > > put it out of way as it doesn't give us anything and as I've already > > mentioned one can trigger it really easily. > > It was there before and goes away in several commits. I have to > explain all that to remove it in this patch. Why do that when the > whole thing is just gonna disappear anyway? I would consider it nicer but if you feel it is not worth it then don't worry. It is not a big deal. The important part is that we do not ignore the return value now. Thanks -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
