Re: [V5 PATCH 08/26] memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 29-10-12 13:40:39, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > > N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
> > > N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.
> > 
> > What is the difference of those two?
> > 
> 
> Patch 5 in the series 

Strange, I do not see that one at the mailing list.

> introduces it to be equal to N_HIGH_MEMORY, so 

So this is just a rename? If yes it would be much esier if it was
mentioned in the patch description.

> accepting this patch would be an implicit ack of the direction taken 
> there.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux