Hi Tejun, On 10/25, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > But! the comment above try_to_freeze() becomes misleading with > > this patch, so this really needs v2. > > But, yeah, I think we should move it above relock: and update the > comment to explain that that's the usual freezing site. Yeeeeeeees, I knew that you won't allow me to simply remove the old comment without adding the new one ;) And you can't imagine how many time I spent trying to invent something meaningful. Please feel free to update/rewrite it, I am not sure it is good enough. Or I can send v3 if you suggest something better. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
