On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:40:28PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > That is exactly what I proposed in our previous discussions around > memcg, with files like "available_controllers" , "current_controllers". > Name chosen to match what other subsystems already do. > > if memcg is not in "available_controllers" for a node, it cannot be seen > by anyone bellow that level. Glauber, I was talking about making the switch applicable from the current level *INSTEAD OF* anyone below the current level, so that we don't have to apply the same switch on all siblings. I have no idea why this is causing so much miscommunication. :( -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
