On 09/14/2012 11:15 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:19:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: >> I want oppose it as well, but I believe part of this exercise is to make >> the need to have hierarchy widespread. Warning on the case >> 1st-level-only case helps with that, even if we make more noise than we >> should. >> >> The reason I supported Tejun's proposal originally, is that I think that >> if we make the wrong amount of noise, being wrong by a surplus is better >> than being wrong by a deficit, in this case. > > I think both are valid points and don't think it makes a lot of > difference either way. Michal being the maintainer of the code, I'm > taking his approach for this one. > > Thanks. > That is fine. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
