Hello, Glauber. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:17:14PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > > I side with Vivek, and I think we should warn first level. It just tends > > to be wrong. If memcg is a special case, just special case it. > > _but_, I see no reason not to do it. The issue at hand is how to handle tasks vs. sub-cgroups in the same cgroup. memcg doesn't factor into this because it doesn't implement proportional control. No matter which way we decide, it doesn't matter for memcg. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
