On 09/12/2012 09:11 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> While I respect your goal of not warning about any configuration >>> with max_level = 1, I believe the only sane configuration as soon >>> as we get any 2nd-level child is use_hierarchy = 1 for everybody. >>> >>> Everything aside from it should be warned. >> >> Defintely. And that what the above guarantess, doesn't it? > > I'm getting a bit worried that I might not be fully understanding what > your concern is. Can you please elaborate what your worries are and > the transition plan that you have in your mind regarding > .use_hierarchy? > This is getting confusing for me as well, because I don't know if your reply was targeted towards me or Michal. As for me, I am in agreement with what you did, and I merely replied to Michal's concern and suggestion of not warning in the special 1-st level only setups saying I side with you. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
