David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:07:10 -0700 > >> >> This is a modest set of changes against the current networking stack to >> enable basic user namespace support. Allowing the code to compile with >> user namespaces enabled and removing the assumption that there is only >> the initial user namespace. >> >> Work to relax the privilege checks in the networking stack from >> "capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)" or "capable(CAP_NET_RAW)" to >> "ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)" or >> "ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_RAW)" allowing root in a user >> namespace to control a network namespace will come later. >> >> David there are just enough interdependencies between the user namespace >> bits that I intend to merge them all through my user namespace tree. >> After the review is complete I will add these patches to my for-next >> branch of my user-namespace.git tree where I do not intend to rebase. >> If it make sense to pull these into net-next to avoid or reduce >> conflicts that should not be a problem. > > Looks fine to me, you can add: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > to all of this stuff. Let me know when something is stable in your > tree, and I can therefore pull from it into net-next. All of these patches + 2 others trivial userns bug fixes are now in my for-next branch at: git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-next I won't be rebasing that branch so feel free to merge it into net-next if you are so inclined. It will be a day or two before I get my next chunk of patches posted, reviewed and ready to join my for-next branch. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
