On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:48:08 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > free_nsproxy() is too heavy to be on exit path. Let's free namespaces > asynchronously to not block exit_group() syscall. Please be specific, and complete. Why is it "too heavy"? Where is the time being spent? Is it spent in D state or is it spent burning CPU cycles? Does the patch simply offload the work into kernel threads, providing no net gain? > The patch also fixes bug with free namespace without synchronize_rcu() through > put_nsproxy(). I just don't understand this description. Please send a new one which includes all details about the bug, including a description of the user-visible effects of the bug. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
