On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:04:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:49:34 +0800 > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:43:39PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> > From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:16:34 +0800 > >> > > >> > > In long run, such build-fix patches can also be auto tested and > >> > > reported, somehow in this way. You just create a temporary branch > >> > > >> > Sorry, no. > >> > >> That's fine. Then how about including some text "fix build errors" or > >> "fix build warnings" or paste the original gcc error/warning messages, > >> somewhere in the changelog or subject? > >> > >> That will also allow me recognize that it's a build fix commit and to > >> make it unconditionally report back any build results. > > > > Or better, simply include a > > > > Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Now that on the other hand I should have done and was an oversight. That's fine. Please feel free to add that "Reported-by" to get verbose build report, as well as to _NOT_ add the above line to avoid receiving reports when the fix is obviously correct. Ie. use the tag as a way to control my script. > But all the other crap, is absolutely unreasonable of you to ask of me. Yup.. Thanks for your time! Regards, Fengguang _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers