On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:30:04PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:08:07AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Currently block layer shares a single request_list (@q->rq) for all > > IOs regardless of their blkcg associations. This means that once the > > shared pool is exhausted, blkcg limits don't mean much. Whoever grabs > > the requests being freed the first grabs the next IO slot. > > Hi Tejun, > > I noticed that lkml is not CCed in this patchset. Is that intentional? I > think it is a good idea to keep lkml CCed for core block layer changes. Eh, crap. Copy & paste mistake. Will resend with the suggested updates and acked-bys added. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers