On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:33:01PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:29:30PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > I am personally is not too excited about the case of putting async IO > > in separate groups due to the reason that async IO of one group will > > start impacting latencies of sync IO of another group and in practice > > it might not be desirable. But there are others who have use cases for > > separate async IO queue. So as long as switch is there to change the > > behavior, I am not too worried. > > Why not just fix cfq so that it prefers groups w/ sync IOs? Yes that could possibly be done but now that's change of requirements. Now we are saying that I want one buffered write to go faster than other buffered write only if there is no sync IO present in any of the groups. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
