On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 04:04:58PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > > So, the current code is technically correct although subtle like hell. > > We can RCU defer blk_put_queue() from blk_cleanup_queue() using > > call_rcu() to make clear that RCU grace period is necessary there. > > Any better ideas? > > Not really ... except that perhaps we might redo LUN scanning to use > just a single queue, so repurpose the LUN underneath, but not destroy > the old queue and setup the new one? It's a bit counter intuitive, but > it shouldn't be impossible. I think we're fine as-is with comment explaining that there can't be any active dereferencing going on by the time release is reached. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
