On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:29:39PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
[..]
> @@ -111,12 +122,11 @@ static struct blkio_group *blkg_alloc(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
> struct blkio_policy_type *pol = blkio_policy[i];
> struct blkg_policy_data *pd;
>
> - if (!pol)
> + if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol))
> continue;
>
> /* alloc per-policy data and attach it to blkg */
> - pd = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pd) + pol->pdata_size, GFP_ATOMIC,
> - q->node);
> + pd = kzalloc_node(blkg_pd_size(pol), GFP_ATOMIC, q->node);
> if (!pd) {
> blkg_free(blkg);
> return NULL;
> @@ -130,7 +140,7 @@ static struct blkio_group *blkg_alloc(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
> for (i = 0; i < BLKCG_MAX_POLS; i++) {
> struct blkio_policy_type *pol = blkio_policy[i];
>
> - if (pol)
> + if (blkcg_policy_enabled(blkg->q, pol))
> pol->ops.blkio_init_group_fn(blkg);
> }
May be pol->ops.blkio_init_group_fn() can be called in the loop above
where you are allocating the group. So you don't end up looping through
policies twice and don't have to call blkcg_policy_enabled() twice.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
