Hello, Vivek. On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 05:09:56PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > blkio_cgroup->weight can be thought of in a more generic manner and that > is sytem wide cgroup weight. And more than one policy should be allowed > to make use of it. That's a differnt thing that currently only CFQ makes > use of it. > > For example, Fengguang posted RFC patches to try to make use of blkcg->weight > and differentiate between buffered write bandwidth. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/28/275 I don't think that's a good idea. It makes it fuzzy which knob controls what. If we're gonna have single set of controls followed by all controllers, fine, but I really don't think we should be mixing different layers of configurations. I mean, what about blkcg.read_bps then? Let's just give this one to cfq. If someone else wants weight, let it use its own weight config. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
