On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:26:43PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 18:19 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: > > Dne 23.2.2012 15:13, Peter Zijlstra napsal: > > > My utter disregard for cgroups comes from having to actually implement a > > > controller for them, its a frigging nightmare. The systemd retards > > > mandating all this nonsense for booting a machine is completely bonghit > > > inspired and hasn't made me feel any better about it. > > > > systemd requires only CONFIG_CGROUPS=y. It does not need any controllers. > > > > The insults are entirely unnecessary. > > At the risk of insulting any systemd person, I recently upgraded my box, > and had my very first encounter with systemd. It didn't go well at all, > to say the very least. In fact, it quickly became a violent removal. > > After the fact, when I queried, I was told straight out that I should > live in harmony with the cgroups configuration systemd set up for me and > be happy. For the nonce, you can remove it, and here's how (thanks for > that guys), but that removal option is _going_ to go away. No, you > can't simply turn our cgroup setup off and control your box as if you > actually _own_ the thing, because cgroups is an integral part of the > systemd concept. > > Really. I hope that was idiotic fanboy tripe, because that flat ain't > gonna happen here, ever. > > Q: you say systemd requires CONFIG_CGROUPS=y. Why is that? It's taking > over sysvinits job afaiui, what does that have to do with cgroups? I think they were using it to track all the children forked by a service and cleanup all of them if need be. So they just need it for logical grouping functionality and don't require any controllers as such. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
