On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:54:16PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:57:50PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > action != CPU_DEAD || action != CPU_DEAD_FROZEN is always true. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I think you don't need to actually CC stable via email. If you > > include that tag, they will pick it up once the patch hits mainline. > > I don't think it's a problem for stable@. > > > > > The changelog is too terse, doubly so for a patch that should go into > > stable. How is the code supposed to work? What are the consequences > > of the bug? > > Is it enough? I think so, thank you. > >From fe1c2f2dc1abf63cce12017e2d9031cf67f0a161 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 04:12:53 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 4/6] memcg: fix broken boolean expression > > action != CPU_DEAD || action != CPU_DEAD_FROZEN is always true. > > We should return at the point if CPU doesn't go away. Otherwise drain > all counters and stocks from the CPU. > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> But without the stable Cc, I guess :) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
