On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:47:34 +0200
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 03:42:52PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:36:52 +0200
> > "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 03:25:31PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 05:00:14 +0200
> > > > "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘memcg_check_events’:
> > > > > mm/memcontrol.c:784:22: warning: unused variable ‘do_numainfo’ [-Wunused-variable]
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Hmm ? Doesn't this fix cause a new Warning ?
> > > >
> > > > mm/memcontrol.c: In function ?memcg_check_events?:
> > > > mm/memcontrol.c:789: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
> > >
> > > I don't see how. The result code is:
> > >
> > > if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> > > MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
> > > bool do_softlimit;
> > >
> > > #if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
> > > bool do_numainfo;
> > > do_numainfo = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> > > MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
> > > #endif
> > > do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
> > > MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
> > > preempt_enable();
> > >
> > > mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
> > >
> >
> > Ah. please see linux-next and rebase onto that.
>
> The patchset is on top of next-20111222. Have I missed something?
>
Ah, ok. my mistake. Sorry.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
