Hello, On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Okay, narrowed exit path protection down to setting of PF_EXITING > > itself. ->exit() on dangling tasks is a bit weird but I don't think > > it's too bad. Frederic, are you okay with this version? > > Yeah that new scheme that only protects PF_EXITING may look a bit > strange. But I think we are fine. With rcu list traversal, it should > be safe even if a group member is concurrently dropped from the list (in that > case all we check if its PF_EXITING then we give up). And we may > have a concurrent ->exit() but that should be fine too. > > Thanks! > > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> Awesome, adding Acked-by, putting it on top of pm-freezer and pushing it out to linux-next. Thank you. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
