Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx): > "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx): > >> There is a small bug here. You want to fixup q->info, not info. > >> Otherwise you might try dereferencing one of the special signals and get > >> a NULL pointer dereference. > > > > Thanks, Eric. Oddly I've not seen this happen in quite a bit of > > testing with the kernel, but you certainly must be right. I sent > > out a new patch to fix that. > > You clearly have a different test case than I do. I ran a good chunk of ltp... and it passed. I can't explain it. > I managed to trigger the oops within about 5 minutes of just fooling > around. > > You want to say &q->info not q->info in your updated patch. Oh, yes, thanks. Sorry, I shouldn't have sent that one as I wasn't able to compile and test until tonight. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
