On Thu 17-11-11 11:14:53, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to understand now why I did that change in > > 2d3cbf8bc (the bug itself was in the if-the-else clause in > update_if_frozen , anyway). > Well, when I look at this now I think that there is nothing wrong > with your patch. > You can try my testcases from 2d3cbf8bc and 0bdba580, but it should be ok. Yes, I have tried it before sending the patch. > One thing I am not sure completely of is the following situation. So > the group is frozen > with the STOPPED task inside. There are few questions: > * if you send SIGCONT to the task now, will it wake up? No, it will enter refrigerator and wake up on thawing the group. Check out `goto relock' after do_signal_stop returns. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
