Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011/11/03 20:03, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sure - I'm just not seeing that a whole separate cgroup for it is
> appropriate or a good plan. Anyone doing real resource management needs
> the rest of the stuff anyway.

Right.  When I saw Frederic's controller today, my first thought was
that one could move the fork limit code over into that controller.  If
we reach a consensus that this would be a good idea, and would have
chances to get merged, I could probably take some time to refactor my
code.

Max
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux