On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:41:25PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Adrian Reber (adrian@xxxxxxxx): > > > > I have ported the linux-cr patches from www.linux-cr.org/pub/git/linux-cr.git > > to the latest kernel (3.1). What I have tested so far it still seems to work. > > Wow, that's great! > > Since you went to the trouble of doing this, can we assume you have a pretty > strong interest in this set? :) If so, Yes, I have. > > Can anybody tell me what the latest state of these patches was? > > Development seemed to have stopped after 2.6.37 and with the wiki[1] being > > down I do not know if anybody is still working on these patches. What > > Matt and Dan, if there is outside interest, are you able to help out at > all? Are you still using this set at all? > > Oren, what's your status? > > > was the latest status about those patches being integrated into > > mainline? Is someone still trying to get it included? > > There is a new upstream effort based around pushing smaller debugging-style > patches, which rather than adding a 'sys_checkpoint' syscall, allow userspace > to get the information they need to reconstruct a process set. Several people, > Daniel (Cc:d) included, seem to prefer this approach. See > http://lwn.net/Articles/452184/ for instance. > > You might peruse the recent lkml threads (and the above article). If you are > ok with that approach, you might consider joining them. AFAICS they've not > done much in the last few months, though I may just have missed it. I interested in whatever approach works best. I just choose the linux-cr tree because it seemed to be the most recent development and it worked. Adrian _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
