On 08/04/2011 09:35 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > Hi, > > Since v1, there is not too much new here. > I'm incorporating David's suggestion of calling the sb > shrinker, which will, in effect, prune the icache and > other sb related objects as well. > > I am also keeping the mount based interface, since I > still believe it is the way to go. But I'm obviously > still open for suggestions. Some small corrections > were also made to it since v1. Specifically, bind > mounts are not allowed to alter the original sb dcache > size. > > Glauber Costa (4): > factor out single-shrinker code > Keep nr_dentry per super block > limit nr_dentries per superblock > parse options in the vfs level > > fs/dcache.c | 44 +++++++++++- > fs/namespace.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/super.c | 16 ++++- > include/linux/dcache.h | 4 + > include/linux/fs.h | 3 + > include/linux/shrinker.h | 6 ++ > mm/vmscan.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > 7 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) > People, Any comments on this? I think I addressed all the comments previously made, and if there are no further requests, I think this is ready for getting in. In case there are issues, please let me know so I can address them. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
