On 07/23/2011 12:50 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:45:02PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> OK I see. Then my answer is - typically a container looks like an >> init task with everybody else growing from that point. Having a >> machine with 1000 of containers building the whole /proc tree in >> memory to dump a single container would be MUCH more expensive that >> having this small like in proc. > > This isn't a major point, so let's leave it alone for now. If it's > necessary, adding it isn't a big deal; however, I think it would > probably be better solved by per-ns procfs. If walking /proc becomes > a huge overhead, CR wouldn't be the only one suffering and it calls > for a better solution. OK. > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
