On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I honestly hate the pattern that is being used here. Holding a
> reference count because we can't be bothered to free things reliably
> when we actually stop using them.
WHAT?
That's what a reference count *is*. It's all about "free things
reliably when we actually stop using them".
Your comment makes zero sense.
EVERY SINGLE kernel data structure should be reference counted. Read
Documentation/CodingStyle, or look at any of the good code in the
kernel (ie core process or VFS code). A non-refcounted data structure
that is used by more than one entity IS A BUG!
Quite frankly, your objection sounds moronic. If there is more than
one user, then a reference count is _always_ the right thing. Nothing
else ever works, and trust me, people have tried. They've tried
locking, they've tried luck, they've tried crazy things. Nothing but
refcounts works.
Linus
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
