On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:10:11AM +0100, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 11:01 +0100 on 10 Jun (1307703699), Tim Deegan wrote: > > Actually, looking at the disassembly you posted, it looks more like it > > might be an emulator bug in Xen; if Xen finds itself emulating the IMUL > > instruction and either gets the logic wrong or does the memory access > > wrong, it could cause that failure. And one reason that Xen emulates > > instructions is if the memory operand is on a pagetable that's shadowed > > (which might be a page that was recently a pagetable). > > > > ISTR that even though the RHEL xen reports a 3.0.x version it has quite > > a lot of backports in it. Does it have this patch? > > http://hg.uk.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg/rev/e8fca4c42d05 > > Oops, that URL doesn't work; I meant this: > http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-3.1-testing.hg/rev/e8fca4c42d05 > RHEL5 Xen (hypervisor) reports version as 3.1.2-xyz.. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
