David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:59:55 -0700 > >> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> The networking bits look OK to me: >>> >>> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Are you merging sendmmsg through the netdev tree? > > Yes. > >> The conflicts on syscall syscall numbers are an unfortunate pain. > > The way we've solved this before is the tree that cares pulls in > the net-next-2.6 tree to resolve the conflict. If that is the precedent that then that makes sense. You are good at not rewinding net-next so I don't expect there will be a problem there. Do you know if there are any plans to support sendmmsg on parisc for 2.6.40? That could get sticky as the parisc tree has a bunch of syscall catchup support they are doing now. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
