On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 08:18 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl@xxxxxxxxx): > > Similar to our handling of fds that have been subject to F_SETOWN, > > detect when an fd has had its f_owner->signum changed from the > > default. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hey Nathan, > > Can you give more motivation for this? Do you just feel that it > isn't worth the risk of mis-coding the check at restart? The principle here is that we should try to catch at checkpoint time that which we don't handle correctly at restart. Right now checkpoint apparently succeeds, but doing a fcntl(F_GETSIG) after a restart will show that the signal set before checkpoint has not been preserved. > For safety check, what about forcing such a task to be restarted > in a private pidns? Sorry, I'm not making the connection between this concern and F_SETSIG and F_GETSIG. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
