Serge, Do you still get this problem with rc2 ? Oren. On 03/23/2011 10:11 PM, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:34:52PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Matt Helsley (matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx): >>> Unfortunately ckptinfo is broken. My most recent series of 18 patches >>> to user-cr fixes it. I've attached the output using an earlier version >> >> Egads. > > Incidentally, those patches don't change checkpoint or restart -- just > the build and ckptinfo. So unless you want to patch your own ckptinfo > or have some quirky old "boxes" like me, you don't need them. > >> >>> beginning. This was masked by some troubles with ckpt_err() which I still >>> haven't been able to figure out -- the "error" reported in dmesg above >>> is -512 but really should be -32 (EPIPE). You rewrote that code, didn't you? ;) >> >> Eeeeyeee know nothink. Nothink! >> >>> Anyhow, today I managed to bisect my user-cr troubles down to: >>> >>> 5b97422c4c1342a128df508cda7c4639ecb24a36 >>> >>> Revert was not clean and the resolved conflicts on top of the revert did >>> not seem to fix the problem, soo... :/ all I can recommend at the moment is >>> sticking to the earlier branches. >> >> >>> Hope that helps. Again, sorry for the delay. >> >> Thanks, Matt. It'll be at least a week before I have a chance to play with >> it again, but I'll give earlier versions a shot. Is there any particular >> matching version for kernel+user-dr which you'd recomment at this point? > > So far the closest thing I have to a working combination is this commit > found via bisect: > > v23-rc1 + user-cr @ f1d427d4ce1df44432fccd2e08c60992c8169b8c > "Ghost tasks must be detached" > > (which just follows: f0fdd38cb0a53594eec9d4e19671d0c33036517c > "headers: regenerate for ckpt-v23-rc1 [x86_32]" -- nice to know it's > about the right spot) > > Watch out for non-matching syscall numbers. The clone_*.* source files > will use old "default" values _very_ _quietly_ if they aren't found via > the updated headers in ./include/linux . Syscall numbers in those files > tend to get updated much less frequently. > > I am testing on x86-32 in KVM at the moment and haven't run everything > so YMMV. > > Cheers, > -Matt Helsley > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
