On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:00:56PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:37:48AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I actually agree, as perf is more focused on per process (or group) than > > ftrace. But that said, I guess the issue is also, if they have a simple > > solution that is not invasive and suits their needs, what's the harm in > > accepting it? > > What about a kind of cgroup_of(path) operator that we can use on > filters? > > common_pid cgroup_of(path) > or > common_pid __cgroup_of__ path > > That way you don't bloat the tracing fast path? Note in this example, we would simply ignore the common_pid value and assume that pid is the one of current. This economizes a step to pid -> task resolution. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
