From: Rob Landley <rlandley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:45:08 -0500 > So you think letting it soak in the merge window and the churn of -rc1 > (which currently doesn't boot for me due to an ide issue) will provide > more validity than a specific "There was an infinite loop in the > filesystem, there is now no longer an infinite loop in the filesystem, > here's the specific test for it" and visual inspection ofthe patch? Yes I absolutely do think it's better to let it soak somewhere than to repeat the reason why this patch is necessary in the first place. This patch is necessary because Eric already screwed up trying to fix this neigh dirctory under ipv6 once, and he got it wrong. That patch looked correct and straightforward. Yet it introduced the bug you're seeing. Given that consideration, are you still holding steady to your opinion wise guy? :-) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
