On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Ben Blum <bblum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmm, you may be right; my understanding of RCU is not complete. But > actually I think the BUG_ON should just be removed, since we're about to > drop locks before handing off to cgroup_attach_proc anyway (so at no > important part is the assertion guaranteed), which will detect and > EAGAIN if such a race happened. Sounds good. > > Hmm, well, should I make this assumption, then? The code would not be > more complicated either way, really. I kind of prefer it as it is... > OK, I guess either way is OK until we can prove otherwise :-) Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
