On 03/11/2011 01:43 PM, Greg Thelen wrote: > Add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty page limits: > Direct write-out is controlled with: > - memory.dirty_ratio > - memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes > > Background write-out is controlled with: > - memory.dirty_background_ratio > - memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes What's the overlap, if any, with the current memory limits controlled by `memory.limit_in_bytes` and the above `memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes`? If I want to fairly balance memory between two cgroups be one a dirty page antagonist (dd) and the other an anonymous page (memcache), do I just set `memory.limit_in_bytes`? Does this patch simply provide a more granular level of control of the dirty limits? Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
