On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 10:40 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > ntl@xxxxxxxxx writes: > > > From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Support for AIO is on the to-do list, but until that is implemented, > > checkpoint will have to fail if a mm_struct has outstanding AIO > > contexts. Add a mm_has_pending_aio() helper function for this > > purpose. > > Just because a process has an io context, doesn't mean that the process > has active outstanding requests. So, is this really what you wanted to > test? As a temporary measure, yeah. We haven't settled on code to record/restore the io context objects themselves, so we do want to bail if we encounter any. I realize now the name of the function doesn't actually express this well. Will try to come up with something better for the next round. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
