On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:35:42 -0500 > Ben Blum <bblum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:09:19AM -0500, Ben Blum wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:22:26AM -0500, Ben Blum wrote: >> > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:46:04AM -0400, Ben Blum wrote: >> > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:56:49PM -0400, Ben Blum wrote: >> > > > > This patch series is a revision of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/25/11 . >> > > > > >> > > > > This patch series implements a write function for the 'cgroup.procs' >> > > > > per-cgroup file, which enables atomic movement of multithreaded >> > > > > applications between cgroups. Writing the thread-ID of any thread in a >> > > > > threadgroup to a cgroup's procs file causes all threads in the group to >> > > > > be moved to that cgroup safely with respect to threads forking/exiting. >> > > > > (Possible usage scenario: If running a multithreaded build system that >> > > > > sucks up system resources, this lets you restrict it all at once into a >> > > > > new cgroup to keep it under control.) >> > > > > > > The above six month old text is the best (and almost the only) > explanation of the rationale for the entire patch series. Is > it still correct and complete? > It's still correct, but I'm sure we could come up with a more detailed justification if necessary. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
