Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > Hi, > > I vaguely recall some discussions/ideas about the possibility > of a devices namespace, its pros and cons, and alternative. > Related to that is also device viruatlization, and isolation > of devices in containers. > > Any thoughts and or pointers to past/current discussions are > welcome :) > > Thanks, What I find in my old containers folders when grepping for 'device namespace' is mainly vague references to devicens as a more ideal solution to other patches being submitted (namely the device cgroup, the sysfs directory tagging, and ptyns). A link which was referenced in one of those emails: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2008-April/010810.html So while I'm pretty sure I have in the past seen discussions on what the device namespace would look like, they must have been on irc or in person. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
