The following 4 patches add supoprt for c/r of HUGETLB pages. They are based on the original post by Nathan Lynch: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-October/025794.html Nathan: I did some serious refactoring of your patches to be able to re-use the existing infrastructure for memory-dump/restore in our code. It would be great if you could double check that the results makes sense. Also, I noticed that during restart the code ignored the 'shift' (or huge page size?) and assumed the default one is used, while in other places it does use the @shift value. Should there not be at least some sanity test and a clear error message in case of mismatch ? Thanks, Oren. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
