On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Ben Blum wrote: > Oh, also, most (not all) times that NODEMASK_ALLOC is used in cpusets, > cgroup_mutex is also held. So how about just using static storage for > them? (There could be a new macro "NODEMASK_ALLOC_STATIC", for use when > the caller can never race against itself.) As long as the call-graph > isn't recursive, there shouldn't be a problem... > Yes, that sounds good but I'd suggest using it only when dynamic allocation cannot be done with GFP_KERNEL to avoid the waste. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
