Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx):
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> +/*
> >> + * userns count is 1 for root user, 1 for init_uts_ns,
> >> + * and 1 for... ?
> >> + */
> >> struct user_namespace init_user_ns = {
> >> .kref = {
> >> - .refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
> >> + .refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(3),
> >
> > +1 is for init_nsproxy ;-)
>
> Err, no.
>
> +1 is to ensure it's never freed, but since allocator will BUG_ON (?) if fed
> with static object, maybe it's completely bogus.
Right. On the one hand so long as it's high enough it doesn't really matter.
But I think it's worth getting the # exactly right in order to help document
what's going on. So I'll try dropping it back down to 2.
thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
