On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:52:36 -0800 Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:45 PM, jacob pan > <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I guess timer_slack_ns alone cannot qualify for a new subsystem, > > I think that it's providing a sufficiently different control from > existing subsystems that making it a separate subsystem is reasonable. > The cpuset subsystem definitely doesn't sound like the right place, > since it's more dealing with numa isolation/policy. The cpu subsystem > could be, since it also deals with scheduling stuff. > > Paul thanks for the pointer. let me try to add a new subsystem. call it timer? perhaps will have future expansion. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
