On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch is similar to what you described. The main differences are > that I used a new atomic to handle the rmdir case, and I converted > check_for_release to be callable in softirq context rather than schedule > work in free_css_set_rcu. Your css_set scanning in rmdir sounds better, > I'll take another look at that. Is there any problem with disabling irqs > with spin_lock_irqsave in check_for_release? free_css_set_rcu needs to take a write lock on css_set_lock to protect the list_del(&link->cgrp_link_list). I'll convert it to schedule work, and change the spin_lock_irqsave back to spin_lock. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
