On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That said, I'll happily drop this patch. It just came to me when I > started to add new bool values to the structure. Or if you prefer > bool xxx:1 or just bool xxx, I can do that. bool xxx:1 is fine with me - I think it's worth keeping the semantics of these being boolean flags as obvious as possible. I just wouldn't invest much effort in similar patches in the future (given that there are only likely to be, what, <20 instances of cgroup_subsys in the kernel?). Shrinking a structure that had potentially very many instances, such as css_set or cg_cgroup_link, would be different of course. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
