Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:09:05 -0700
> Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Document cgroup dirty memory interfaces and statistics.
>> 
>>
>> ...
>>
>> +When use_hierarchy=0, each cgroup has dirty memory usage and limits.
>> +System-wide dirty limits are also consulted.  Dirty memory consumption is
>> +checked against both system-wide and per-cgroup dirty limits.
>> +
>> +The current implementation does enforce per-cgroup dirty limits when
>
> "does not", I trust.

Correct.  Thanks.

>> +use_hierarchy=1.  System-wide dirty limits are used for processes in such
>> +cgroups.  Attempts to read memory.dirty_* files return the system-wide values.
>> +Writes to the memory.dirty_* files return error.  An enhanced implementation is
>> +needed to check the chain of parents to ensure that no dirty limit is exceeded.
>> +
>>  6. Hierarchy support
>>  
>>  The memory controller supports a deep hierarchy and hierarchical accounting.
>> -- 
>> 1.7.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux