On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:09:14 -0700 Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then > balance_dirty_pages() will consider the memcg dirty limits > as well as the system-wide limits. This allows different > cgroups to have distinct dirty limits which trigger direct > and background writeback at different levels. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ideally, I think some comments in the code for "why we need double-check system's dirty limit and memcg's dirty limit" will be appreciated. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
