On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:00:15 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:39:44 -0700 > Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then > > global_dirty_limits() will consider the memcg dirty limit. > > This allows different cgroups to have distinct dirty limits > > which trigger direct and background writeback at different > > levels. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Why FREEPAGES in memcg is not counted as dirtyable ? Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
