On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:53:14 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I propose restricting page_cgroup.flags to 16 bits. The patch for the > same is below. Comments? > > > Restrict the bits usage in page_cgroup.flags > > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Restricting the flags helps control growth of the flags unbound. > Restriciting it to 16 bits gives us the possibility of merging > cgroup id with flags (atomicity permitting) and saving a whole > long word in page_cgroup > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Doesn't make sense until you show the usage of existing bits. And I guess 16bit may be too large on 32bit systems. Nack for now. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
