On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Andrea Righi wrote: > mmh... looking at the code it seems the same behaviour, but in > Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt we say a different thing (i.e., for > dirty_bytes): > > "If dirty_bytes is written, dirty_ratio becomes a function of its value > (dirty_bytes / the amount of dirtyable system memory)." > > However, in dirty_bytes_handler()/dirty_ratio_handler() we actually set > the counterpart value as 0. > > I think we should clarify the documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for cc'ing me on this, Andrea. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
